Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Henning vs Luca Fantini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Fantini analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Henning vs Luca Fantini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Henning 0 - 0 Fantini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 56.21% of points on their second serve, while Fantini has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 53.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fantini has won 54.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.26% and 34.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 60.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fantini has saved 59.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 85.45% of matches played (W/L 47/ 8), with Fantini winning 56.9% (W/L 33/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 12/ 5). Fantini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 45/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.45% of matches (W/L 47/ 8), where as Fantini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.31 while Fantini has played against players with an average rank of 102.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fantini has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 46.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fantini has converted 47.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
523
Rank
523
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
798
Rank
798
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
80% (56-14)
Career Total W/L
60% (94-63)
86% (24-4)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Luca Fantini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 86% (24/4) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (50/14) | 57% (21/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (360/247) | 53% (174/152) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 92% (12/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (12/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 108 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:21 | 1:16:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 105.36 | 121.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1270/1850) | 61% (523/863) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (903/1270) | 67% (352/523) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (326/580) | 51% (174/340) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (100/213) | 48% (43/89) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (827/1950) | 41% (353/853) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (24/4) | 53% (8/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (24/28) | 63% (10/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 82% (9/11) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (6/4) | 13% (8/1) |
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Maik Steiner
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Dev Javia
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
29 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Chirag Duhan
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kabir Hans
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
9 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Fantini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Luca Fantini
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Luca Fantini
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Federico Valle
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Unknown Player
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Luca Fantini
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Luca Fantini
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
61%
(
11 of
18)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
27
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Christopher Heck
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Luca Fantini
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Henning Vs Fantini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
